<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: getting state assistance and child support?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cheap-breakdowncover.com/2010/04/getting-state-assistance-and-child-support/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cheap-breakdowncover.com/2010/04/getting-state-assistance-and-child-support/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 21:40:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AE</title>
		<link>http://www.cheap-breakdowncover.com/2010/04/getting-state-assistance-and-child-support/comment-page-1/#comment-305</link>
		<dc:creator>AE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 18:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://badz.info/cheap-breakdown-cover/2010/04/getting-state-assistance-and-child-support/#comment-305</guid>
		<description>The father is responsible for the child.  The government is not.  It is not right to expect the government to support a child if the father has not paid his fair share.  The government is responsible for making sure that all citizen who require help receive help.  If some take more than they are entitled to then others go without.  Why should others go without just because she doesn&#039;t want the dad to be involved?  That is not the government&#039;s problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The father is obliged for a child.  The supervision is not.  It is not right to design a supervision to await a kid if a father has not paid his satisfactory share.  The supervision is obliged for creation certain which all adult who need assistance embrace help.  If a little take some-more than they have been entitled to afterwards others go without.  Why should others go but only since she doesn&#8217;t wish a father to be involved?  That is not a government&#8217;s problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Motherhood is cool!</title>
		<link>http://www.cheap-breakdowncover.com/2010/04/getting-state-assistance-and-child-support/comment-page-1/#comment-304</link>
		<dc:creator>Motherhood is cool!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 18:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://badz.info/cheap-breakdown-cover/2010/04/getting-state-assistance-and-child-support/#comment-304</guid>
		<description>In every state if you want state assistance they want the name of the dad, every single state.

The argument you should use with her is that she is being selfish not wanting the best for her child, and even people who get child support don&#039;t necessarily have to share the kid.  There are thousands of men who pay support, but have no legal visitation with the kid.  And if she has a really good reason why she doesn&#039;t want the guy in her life then she can explain it to the judge and if she doesn&#039;t have a good reason then she is just going to hurt that child when one day they ask for their birth certificate to sign up for drivers education and under father it says...UNKNOWN....like the mom was a whore and didn&#039;t know which guy was the father......

food for thought!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In each state if we wish state benefit they wish a name of a dad, each singular state.</p>
<p>The evidence we should operate with her is that she is being greedy not wanting a most appropriate for her child, as well as even people who get kid await do not indispensably have to share a kid.  There have been thousands of group who compensate support, though have no authorised visitation with a kid.  And if she has a unequivocally great reason because she doesn&#8217;t wish a man in her hold up afterwards she can insist it to a decider as well as if she doesn&#8217;t have a great reason afterwards she is only starting to harm that kid when a single day they ask for their bieing born obligation to pointer up for drivers preparation as well as underneath father it says&#8230;UNKNOWN&#8230;.like a mother was a prostitute as well as didn&#8217;t know that man was a father&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>food for thought!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angel_Mom *Happily Married*</title>
		<link>http://www.cheap-breakdowncover.com/2010/04/getting-state-assistance-and-child-support/comment-page-1/#comment-303</link>
		<dc:creator>Angel_Mom *Happily Married*</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 18:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://badz.info/cheap-breakdown-cover/2010/04/getting-state-assistance-and-child-support/#comment-303</guid>
		<description>First off, any form of government aide is NOT FREE and is paid for with MY TAX DOLLARS so Uncle Sam WILL FORCE her to name the father in order to get anything from those programs.

Further, a CHILD deserves the Emotional and Financial support of BOTH parents so by denying the CHILD of the father, she is HURTING the CHILD.

She needs the support of the father to care for the child and the child needs a father whether she likes it or not.

I didn&#039;t want my ex knowing I was keeping the baby and was going to let him think I aborted... I realized that I would be doing my child more harm than good, and so glad I changed my mind.

My daughter is financially and emotionally supported by BOTH of her parents.  She also has my now-husband (her step-dad) and THREE Families that love her.

If her income is above the poverty line for a 2 person family then she won&#039;t qualify for childcare assistance and even if she does qualify the likelihood that she will be eligible immediately is slim to none because almost every state has a waiting list for up to 10 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off, any form of supervision help is NOT FREE as well as is paid for with MY TAX DOLLARS so Uncle Sam WILL FORCE her to name the father in sequence to get anything from those programs.</p>
<p>Further, the CHILD deserves the Emotional as well as Financial await of BOTH relatives so by denying the CHILD of the father, she is HURTING the CHILD.</p>
<p>She needs the await of the father to caring for the kid as well as the kid needs the father either she likes it or not.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t wish my ex meaningful we was gripping the baby as well as was starting to let him consider we aborted&#8230; we satisfied which we would be you do my kid some-more mistreat than good, as well as so blissful we altered my mind.</p>
<p>My daughter is financially as well as emotionally upheld by BOTH of her parents.  She additionally has my now-husband (her step-dad) as well as THREE Families which adore her.</p>
<p>If her income is on top of the misery line for the 2 chairman family afterwards she won&#8217;t validate for childcare benefit as well as even if she does validate the odds which she will be authorised rught away is slim to nothing since roughly each state has the watchful list for up to 10 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flower</title>
		<link>http://www.cheap-breakdowncover.com/2010/04/getting-state-assistance-and-child-support/comment-page-1/#comment-302</link>
		<dc:creator>Flower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 17:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://badz.info/cheap-breakdown-cover/2010/04/getting-state-assistance-and-child-support/#comment-302</guid>
		<description>If she gets $1500 a month she is too high income to qualify for Medicaid. She might be able to get assistance but call the local county social services office of Dept of Health &amp; Human Services.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If she gets $1500 a month she is as well tall income to validate for Medicaid. She competence be means to get benefit though call a internal county amicable services bureau of Dept of Health &#038; Human Services.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: First</title>
		<link>http://www.cheap-breakdowncover.com/2010/04/getting-state-assistance-and-child-support/comment-page-1/#comment-301</link>
		<dc:creator>First</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 17:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://badz.info/cheap-breakdown-cover/2010/04/getting-state-assistance-and-child-support/#comment-301</guid>
		<description>Best idea is to get child care support form the father. She needs him to help care for the chile, they cost so much to raise one now a days.
Also daycare can go anywhere from 500-1000$ per month. I would just get like a neighborhood kid that i trust and pay him so much to take care of the baby.

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best thought is to get child caring await form a father. She needs him to assistance caring for a chile, they price so most to lift a single right away a days.<br />
Also daycare can go anywhere from 500-1000$ per month. we would only get similar to a area child which i certitude as well as compensate him so most to take caring of a baby.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael H</title>
		<link>http://www.cheap-breakdowncover.com/2010/04/getting-state-assistance-and-child-support/comment-page-1/#comment-300</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 16:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://badz.info/cheap-breakdown-cover/2010/04/getting-state-assistance-and-child-support/#comment-300</guid>
		<description>She needs to file against the father. Any state aid will require her to name the father. The thought pattern behind that is that the state doesn&#039;t want to force the taxpayers to support the child if the father is supposed to be.

It is his responsibility (and hers) not the taxpayers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She needs to record opposite a father. Any state assist will need her to name a father. The suspicion settlement at a back of which is which a state doesn&#8217;t wish to force a taxpayers to await a kid if a father is ostensible to be.</p>
<p>It is his shortcoming (and hers) not a taxpayers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hd</title>
		<link>http://www.cheap-breakdowncover.com/2010/04/getting-state-assistance-and-child-support/comment-page-1/#comment-299</link>
		<dc:creator>Hd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 16:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://badz.info/cheap-breakdown-cover/2010/04/getting-state-assistance-and-child-support/#comment-299</guid>
		<description>if she wants assistance she has to do whatever they want including naming the child&#039;s father. they will go after him for child support. it&#039;s up to her if she wants help or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if she wants benefit she has to do whatever they wish together with fixing a child&#8217;s father. they will go after him for kid support. it&#8217;s up to her if she wants assistance or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

